1) Rethinking
Indian intellectual traditions with particular interest in: anubhava in
Bhakti tradition, conceptualizations of ethics, theorizing Indian
democracy, orientalism and Indian social sciences, critique of
post-colonial political and social theories, Gandhi’s swaraj and
cognitive enslavement.
Problems: What is Bhakti? Is it a different kind of knowledge or something different from knowledge?
What problematizations characterize ethics in Indian intellectual
traditions? How to account for the diversity of ethical traditions?
What is the relationship between reflexivity, truth and ethics in these
traditions?
2) Reconceptualizing the Human Sciences: Philosophy as it relates to
the enterprise of understanding culture, ethics and politics, with
special interest in Marx, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Wittgenstein and
Foucault.
Problems: what are norms? How to characterize normativity? What is
the relationship between normativity, secularization and the human
sciences in the West?
The problem of truth and self and of experience and norms in Western philosophy and in the human sciences.
___________________________________
2. Modernity in Portuguese Colonialism
Coordinator: Dr. Rochelle Pinto
The study of Portuguese colonialism in Goa often suffers the
same fate as that of its colonial empire from the eighteenth century on
– a reliance on terms set by British colonial rule in India. While the
enumeration and regulation of cultural difference in colonial India
(British) has now acquired a rich history, the most fundamental
categories through which colonial culture was viewed by the Portuguese
have scarcely been theorized in the case of Goa. This project traces
the interpretive structures through which questions of caste, religion,
and cultural practices, took shape under the distinctive pattern of
Iberian colonialism.
This involves examining the negotiation of cultural difference
through categories generated by the Catholic Church, by the Portuguese
colonial state, and its associated institutions. Portugal’s particular
situation vis-à-vis the enlightenment and its forms of knowledge, did
not make for any direct transition between these early imperatives for
knowledge production about colonial society, and those prompting
orientalist and colonial enterprises of the late eighteenth and early
nineteenth centuries. This study traces texts and practices when the
production of categories and ethnographies had not entirely become a
science that informed colonial governance.
___________________________________
3. Defining Indian Liberalism
Coordinator: Dr. Prasanta Chakravarty
Contemporary Indian liberalism is as much shaped by certain
Western, modern and colonial experience as it has been a reaction to
the instrumental, teleological and ultimately oppressive aspects of
that same tradition—sometimes based on an indigenous bank of liberal
ideas and often by a radical innovation of political initiatives that
challenged the moderate mainstream varieties of Western liberal thought
at various levels.
This project considers the relationship of Indian liberal thought in
the past century with the thought and activities of the western liberal
tradition. Clearly, the early Indian liberals were deeply affected, not
only by the logic of political autonomy latent in the works of John
Locke, John Stuart Mill or Benjamin Constant but also by the
communitarian ideals of neo-Hegelians like T.H. Green and Bernard
Bosanquet. This study would like to consider, however, whether the
germs of a certain kind of liberal thinking in India, in Gandhi for
example, can be traced back to early modern radical anti-monarchists
and anti-parliamentarians—to John Lilburne and Gerrard Winstanley, to
the heretical antinomians and socinians.